Compare Hillside Primary School and Wood Lane Primary School and Woodcocks' Well CofE Primary School
Comparison of primary schools: Hillside Primary School (Primary) in Stoke-on-Trent; Wood Lane Primary School (Primary) in Stoke-on-Trent; Woodcocks' Well CofE Primary School (Primary) in Stoke-on-Trent — covering Ofsted outcomes, size, FSM%, governance, capacity & more.
At a glance
This page compares Hillside Primary School, Wood Lane Primary School and Woodcocks' Well CofE Primary School. They are primary phase and community school, foundation school and voluntary aided school type located around Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire. The strongest headline Ofsted judgement here is 2 (Hillside Primary School), published Jun 2023. The lowest is 3 (Wood Lane Primary School), published May 2023. The most recent inspection on record is for Woodcocks' Well CofE Primary School (Sep 2024). average roll around ≈ 100, combined total ≈ 350, typical FSM 20–25%, range 10–15%–35–40%; across local authorities including Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire and Cheshire East.
| Attribute |
Hillside Primary School
ST2 7AS
|
Wood Lane Primary School
ST7 8PH
|
Woodcocks' Well CofE Primary School
ST7 3NQ
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase / Type | Primary • Community school | Primary • Foundation school | Primary • Voluntary aided school |
| Location |
Stoke-on-Trent Staffordshire ST2 7AS |
Stoke-on-Trent Staffordshire ST7 8PH |
Stoke-on-Trent Staffordshire ST7 3NQ |
| Latest Ofsted | 2 18 Jun 2023 | 3 21 May 2023 | 3 23 Sep 2024 |
| Ofsted report | — | — | — |
| Pupils (roll) | ≈ 200 🔒 Unlock exact pupils | ≈ 50 🔒 Unlock exact pupils | ≈ 100 🔒 Unlock exact pupils |
| FSM % | 10–15% 🔒 Unlock exact FSM % | 35–40% 🔒 Unlock exact FSM % | 10–15% 🔒 Unlock exact FSM % |
| Capacity | 210 | 120 | 120 |
| Capacity utilisation | Over capacity 🔒 View exact % | Under capacity 🔒 View exact % | Under capacity 🔒 View exact % |
| Age range | — | — | — |
| Gender | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed |
| Admissions policy | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Trust / Local authority | Stoke-on-Trent (861) | Staffordshire (860) | Cheshire East (895) |
| Website | hillsideprimary.org.uk | www.woodlane.staffs.sch.uk | www.woodcockswell.cheshire.sch.uk |
| Telephone | 01782235350 | 01782720487 | 01782512323 |
| SEN provision | None reported | None reported | None reported |
| Profile | View profile | View profile | View profile |
- Phase / Type
- Primary • Community school
- Location
- Stoke-on-Trent
Staffordshire
ST2 7AS - Ofsted
- 2 18 Jun 2023
- Pupils
- ≈ 200 🔒 Exact value
- FSM %
- 10–15% 🔒 Exact %
- Trust / LA
- Stoke-on-Trent (861)
- Website
- hillsideprimary.org.uk
- Telephone
- 01782235350
- Phase / Type
- Primary • Foundation school
- Location
- Stoke-on-Trent
Staffordshire
ST7 8PH - Ofsted
- 3 21 May 2023
- Pupils
- ≈ 50 🔒 Exact value
- FSM %
- 35–40% 🔒 Exact %
- Trust / LA
- Staffordshire (860)
- Website
- www.woodlane.staffs.sch.uk
- Telephone
- 01782720487
- Phase / Type
- Primary • Voluntary aided school
- Location
- Stoke-on-Trent
Staffordshire
ST7 3NQ - Ofsted
- 3 23 Sep 2024
- Pupils
- ≈ 100 🔒 Exact value
- FSM %
- 10–15% 🔒 Exact %
- Trust / LA
- Cheshire East (895)
- Website
- www.woodcockswell.cheshire.sch.uk
- Telephone
- 01782512323
For parents & carers
Export this comparison & share it at home
Keep your shortlist organised with one-click exports to PDF and Excel — plus ad-free browsing and deeper filters.
Families often subscribe for a short research period, export what they need, then cancel once they’re confident.
- Printable PDF — great for family discussions and open-day planning.
- Excel export — add your own notes, rank schools and keep a shortlist.
- Profile exports — save individual school pages to PDF/Excel when you’re comparing many options.
- Deeper filters — narrow down realistic options faster (area, type, phase, trust and more).
What you get immediately
After joining, you unlock all Pro features — including exporting this exact comparison plus any other comparisons and school profiles you view (PDF & Excel).
🔒 Secure Stripe payments · Cancel anytime · No impact on admissions outcomes